by David Balashinsky
The right-wing propaganda machine - Fox,
Breitbart, Roger Ailes, Rupert Murdoch, Steve Bannon, and their ilk - as
well as the vast majority of the Republican Party, by supporting the
campaign and presidency of Donald J. Trump, bear a moral responsibility
for the horrendous display of radical anti-Americanism that occurred in
Charlottesville this weekend. They are
responsible either by having actively supported Trump's bigotry with
their words and their votes or by having tacitly supported it with their
silence when they had the chance to speak up and chose not to. Let's not
forget that Trump ran on a campaign of bigotry and nativism in which he
exhorted his followers to thuggery and mob violence. Even now, Trump
refuses to unambiguously disclaim and repudiate the neo-Nazis,
anti-Semites, and white nationalists who proudly marched in his name
this weekend. Instead, Trump seems to have taken pains to avoid
alienating the white-nationalist segment of his base by refusing to explicitly identify
them and by creating a false equivalence between them and those who oppose them. This
was Trump's mealy-mouthed and winking statement about the violence, as
reported in the Washington Post: "The hate and division must stop and
must stop right now. We condemn in the strongest possible terms this
egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence on many sides. On
many sides." Note how Trump goes out of his way to emphasize, with the
rhetorical technique of repetition, the false narrative that the white
nationalists and those who oppose them are morally equivalent. That
neo-Nazis, white nationalists and anti-Semites and those other Americans
who happen to believe in the ideals on which this nation was founded -
that all people are created equal - are all equally to blame. As the
Post reported, "Asked by a reporter whether he wanted the support of
white nationalists, dozens of whom wore red Make America Great Again
hats during the Charlottesville riots, Trump did not respond." Let that
sink in: Trump was lobbed the easiest sort of softball question in
which he was offered the easiest of opportunities to explicitly
repudiate white nationalists. Yet this pretender to the Oval Office,
who never shies away from criticizing or condemning anyone else, could
not bring himself to repudiate the political support of white
nationalists.
In a way, Trump's false equivalence here is perfectly
fitting, given that the ostensible reason for this gathering of racist
groups from around the United States in Charlottesville was to protest
the impending removal of the statue of Robert E. Lee from what is now
known as Emancipation Park. (One concise history of the efforts to
remove this statue can be found here: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/13/us/charlottesville-rally-protest-statue.html.)
After all, those who defend the preservation of monuments to the
Confederacy in public spaces seldom if ever do so on the basis of a
defense of the enslavement of millions of black people. Rather, they
seek to create an alternative meaning for these monuments: They
represent the sacrifice of people who sincerely believed in the cause
for which they gave their lives. Or they represent the neutral and
abstract principle of "states' rights." Or, conversely, the campaign
to have them removed from public spaces constitutes a misguided attempt
to negate or rewrite history. What all of these formulations have in
common is that they disingenuously attempt to deny the actual meaning of
these monuments: that the enslavement of millions of black people is a
part of our nation's history that deserves to be honored and that the
effort to preserve slavery by Confederate heroes such as Robert E. Lee
was honorable. By avoiding the real significance of these monuments,
the monuments' defenders attempt to position themselves and their
opponents on the same moral plane. This is the technique that has
become fashionable in right-wing circles and that has been elevated to
high art by the right-wing media as epitomized by Fox and Breitbart.
Thus, the moral distinction between supporting and opposing a monument
to slavery itself becomes blurred or even effaced. Similarly, in Trump's
version of what occurred this weekend, it was not specifically
white-nationalist hatred, racism, bigotry and violence that were on
display in Charlottesville but a generic, non-specific "hatred, bigotry,
and violence," and there is enough culpability for that to go around -
isn't there? - "on many sides - On many sides."
But hatred of "non-whites" is not the moral equivalent of
hatred of racists and racism. And so back to Trump and the outbreak
of violence over the significance of the Robert E. Lee statue in
Emancipation Park.
If there were any doubt that a direct link exists between Trump's candidacy, his campaign rhetoric,
his presidency and the full flowering of the neo-Nazi,
white-nationalist movement that was on display yesterday in
Charlottesville, the presence of all those MAGA hats should dispel it
once and for all. The neo-fascists, after all, make no bones about
their explicit intentions "to take our country back" and
they plainly have hitched their wagon to Trump the candidate and now
Trump the president. Here is what one self-identified Nazi, Michael
Von Kotch, interviewed by the Post in Charlottesville yesterday, had to
say. The rally made him "proud to be white." The Post article
continues: "[Von Kotch] said that he's long held white supremacist views
and that Trump's election has 'emboldened' him and the members of his
own Nazi group. 'We are assembled to defend our history, our heritage,
and to protect our race to the last man.'" David Duke - ardent Trump supporter, white nationalist, and former head of the KKK
- responded to Trump's faux condemnation of the white nationalist
rally in Charlottesville by publicly reminding Trump of the debt tht he
owes to his white-nationalist base. Addressing Trump directly, Duke
wrote, “I would recommend you take a good look in the mirror
& remember it was White Americans who put you in the presidency, not
radical leftists.”
Trump and his fellow opportunistic Republican
politicians are perfectly happy to exploit the strain of bigotry that,
sadly, still runs through part of the nation's electorate when doing so
assures them a win at the ballot box, in the state house or in congress.
But by doing so, they have opened a Pandora's Box of racism, white
nationalism, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, sexism, homophobia and
transphobia and everything else that the "alt-right" stands for. They cannot
have it both ways. They could have taken - as a few did - a moral
stand against Trump last year, but chose not to. Now they must
acknowledge their own moral culpability in this national disgrace. For
Republicans - who acquiesced in Trump's candidacy last year and
acquiesce in his presidency now - to shed crocodile tears about what
happened yesterday in Charlottesville constitutes the height of hypocrisy.
